Have a question?
Send enquiry
Message sent Close
ILM Assignment Help > ILM Level 5 > ILM 8607-522 Assignment Example

ILM 8607-522 Assignment Example

No Comments
ILM 8607-522 Assignment Example
🟠 ILM Level 5 — Leadership & Management
✍️ Written by James Carter, ILM Level 5 📑 Applied to Own Organisation

This 8607-522 assignment example provides a complete, high-pass standard response to the ILM 8607-522 unit — Becoming an Effective Leader. It covers both learning outcomes and all 5 assessment criteria (AC 1.1–2.2) with Harvard-style referencing. 8607-522 is the flagship leadership unit in the ILM Level 5 Certificate and Diploma in Leadership and Management — it requires critical self-evaluation of your leadership capability across multiple dimensions, supported by genuine evidence and theory.

Unlike Level 3 units that ask you to describe and explain leadership concepts, Level 5 demands evaluative analysis. You must assess your strengths and development areas with evidence, apply theoretical frameworks critically, and demonstrate the strategic self-awareness expected of a middle manager operating at a higher level of organisational responsibility.

📋 Table of Contents

  1. LO1: Understand Own Ability to Fulfil Key Leadership Responsibilities
    1. AC 1.1 – Evaluate own ability to use a range of leadership styles
    2. AC 1.2 – Use theories of emotional intelligence to review impact of emotions
    3. AC 1.3 – Review own ability to set direction and communicate effectively
  2. LO2: Be Able to Evaluate Own Ability to Lead Others
    1. AC 2.1 – Assess own ability to motivate, delegate, and empower
    2. AC 2.2 – Produce a personal development plan to improve leadership
  3. Reference List
  4. Frequently Asked Questions
  5. Related ILM Level 5 Units

AC 1.1 — Evaluate Own Ability to Use a Range of Leadership Styles in Different Situations

Effective leadership requires the ability to adapt style to context — what Hersey and Blanchard term situational leadership (cited in Northouse, 2022). I have evaluated my ability to deploy four leadership styles across different workplace situations, drawing on self-reflection, my most recent 360-degree feedback report, and my line manager’s appraisal comments.

Participative / Democratic Style

This is my strongest and most natural style. When leading team meetings, project planning sessions, and policy development, I consistently involve team members in decision-making — seeking their input, facilitating discussion, and building consensus before implementation. My 360-degree feedback confirms this: team members rated my “involvement of others in decisions” at 4.5/5 and commented that “she creates an environment where everyone’s voice is heard.” My line manager noted that my participative approach builds strong team ownership of outcomes and reduces resistance to change.

Evaluation: This style is highly effective when time permits and team members have relevant knowledge — it produces better-quality decisions and stronger commitment. However, I over-rely on this style in situations where it is less appropriate, such as time-pressured operational decisions where a more directive approach would be faster and more efficient (Northouse, 2022).

Directive / Authoritative Style

This is my weakest style. I find it uncomfortable to make unilateral decisions and give direct instructions without consultation. My 360-degree feedback identified this: my line manager commented that “in crisis situations, you sometimes seek too much input when what the team needs is clear direction.” In a recent incident where a system failure required rapid reallocation of workload, I spent too long consulting team members when a swift directive decision would have minimised disruption.

Evaluation: My reluctance to use a directive style limits my effectiveness in emergencies, tight deadlines, and situations where team members lack the expertise to contribute meaningfully. Developing comfort with directive leadership — without abandoning my natural participative strengths — is a key development priority (Western, 2024).

Coaching Style

This is a developing strength. I use a coaching approach effectively in one-to-one development conversations — asking open questions, encouraging self-reflection, and supporting team members in finding their own solutions. Two team members specifically highlighted this in their feedback: “She helps me think through problems rather than just giving me the answer.” However, I am less effective at coaching in the moment during busy operational periods, when I revert to providing solutions rather than facilitating learning.

Delegating Style

This is adequate but inconsistent. I delegate effectively to highly competent team members whom I trust, but I struggle to delegate to those who are competent but less confident — I tend to retain oversight rather than fully empowering them. My line manager observed: “You delegate well to your top performers but micromanage your middle performers, which limits their growth.”

AC 1.2 — Use Theories of Emotional Intelligence to Review the Impact of Emotions on Performance Goleman’s Five Components of Emotional Intelligence (cited in Northouse, 2022) provide the framework for this review: self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills. Self-Awareness I have strong self-awareness of my emotional states and their triggers. I recognise when I am feeling frustrated (typically when facing resistance to change or dealing with repeated errors) and can usually identify the emotion before it influences my behaviour.

ur. My 360-degree feedback supports this — colleagues describe me as “measured” and “self-aware.” However, I am less aware of how my non-verbal communication (facial expressions, tone of voice) conveys emotions I am trying to manage internally. One team member noted: “She says she’s fine but sometimes her expression says otherwise.” This demonstrates a gap between my perceived and projected emotional state that I need to address (Goleman, 2021). Self-Regulation I generally regulate my emotions well in professional settings — I do not raise my voice, make impulsive decisions, or express frustration publicly. However, under sustained pressure (such as during the recent organisational restructuring), my self-regulation deteriorates — I become more abrupt in communications, less patient with questions, and less available for informal conversations. This impacts team morale precisely when they need the most emotional stability from their leader (Goleman, 2021). Empathy Empathy is one of my strongest EI components. I am attentive to team members’ emotional states, anticipate how decisions will affect them personally, and adjust my communication accordingly. During the restructuring, I proactively scheduled individual conversations with every affected team member to understand their concerns — before they were required to raise them. My line manager commented: “Your empathy is a significant strength — the team trust...

Subscribe to Unlock

Subscribe to unlock this premium content and access our entire library of exclusive learning materials.

Subscribe to Unlock